Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ricardas Berankis vs Ji Sung Nam Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Berankis vs Nam analysis and find out who is favored!
Ricardas Berankis vs Ji Sung Nam Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Berankis 0 - 0 Nam
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Berankis has won 49.86% of points on their second serve, while Nam has won 45.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Berankis, in recent form, has won 53.77% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nam has won 49.67%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.52% and 32.31% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Berankis has saved 59.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nam has saved 52.56% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Berankis has won 56.14% of matches played (W/L 32/ 25), with Nam winning 46.67% (W/L 14/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Berankis has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 218/ 107), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 66/ 65). Nam has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 232/ 169), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Berankis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.1% of matches (W/L 27/ 22), where as Nam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.15% of matches (W/L 13/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Berankis has played against opponents with an average rank of 341.07 while Nam has played against players with an average rank of 315.07.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Berankis has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nam has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Berankis has converted 40.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nam has converted 40.26% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
307
Rank
50
High
33
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
663
Rank
236
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
60% (577-384)
Career Total W/L
56% (279-215)
61% (22-14)
YTD W/L
45% (5-6)
$2,395,158
Career Prize Money
$1,445
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ricardas Berankis | Ji Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (22/14) | 45% (5/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (49/40) | 42% (11/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (444/404) | 47% (113/130) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) | 56% (5/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (10/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 124 | 31 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.35 |
| DFs Total | 97 | 41 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:51 | 1:39:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 286.53 | 184.18 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1491/2532) | 59% (446/761) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1037/1491) | 68% (305/446) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (519/1041) | 46% (144/315) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (113/276) | 40% (31/77) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (1062/2607) | 39% (310/795) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 59% (20/14) | 50% (4/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (21/35) | 45% (5/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (9/14) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 69% (11/16) | 75% (3/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 85% (20/17) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 15% (20/3) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 31% (16/5) | 25% (8/2) |
Ricardas Berankis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Blake Mott
Player
Ricardas Berankis
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Ricardas Berankis
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Antoine Escoffier
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
5
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
7
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Brandon Holt
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
76%
(
41 of
54)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jie Cui
Player
Ricardas Berankis
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
59 of
107)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
92)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
7
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
107
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Ricardas Berankis
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
46%
(
23 of
50)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Yanki Erel
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
2
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
5
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
10
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
10
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Ji Sung Nam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Ji Sung Nam
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Yunseong Chung
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Kaito Uesugi
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Shintaro Imai
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Ji Sung Nam
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Otto Virtanen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Ji Sung Nam
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
79 of
122)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
53 of
122)
112
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Berankis Vs Nam Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Berankis are available here and Nam photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
